Argument Paper#2 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Argument Paper2 - Essay ExampleGM food products should be designate because it is the right of the citizens to decide what they eat, because this will enable informed decision making and because this will sum up the favourableness of the smaller business owners.GM food should be labeled as food processed and produced through and through the method of genetic alteration because this would provide eat onrs to decide what they want to eat and what they want to avoid. If GM foods atomic number 18 not labeled, the consumers will feel that they are world forced to purchase goods and services that they do not want to consume. If GM foods continue to be sold in the markets without being labeled then it would understandably give an impression to the consumers that they are being coerced in to purchasing food items that they perceive to have a negative impact on their health. According to Runyon, the majority of the citizens are in favor of labeling GM foods as the author cites a panel re view in which 11 votes were casted in the favor of labeling (Runyon, 2014).GM foods should be labeled because this would allow consumers to make informed choices. Consumers have become very concerned about what they consume due to increase in awareness of health issues. Many consumers are of the perception that GM foods green goddess affect their health and wellbeing in a negative manner. Even several researches have proven that GM foods can impact the health of human beings in a negative manner. According to a research cited by Bronner in his article, herbicides that are highly toxic in nature are being sprayed in the fields where GM food crops are being produced and these toxic herbicides can have a major impact on the health of consumers (Bronner, 2014).GM foods should be labeled because labeling will allow forward motion of production of food products in a healthier and organic manner and will even increase the profitability of small businesses. Those who oppose labeling belie ve that the cost of labeling would