Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Interpersonal and organisational effectiveness and identify areas for Assignment

Interpersonal and organisational effectiveness and identify areas for professional development - Assignment Example I will use the communication process model to aid in understanding why this critical incident occurred and how such situations can be avoided in the future. There are three types-linear, interactive and transactional models (Johnson, 2014). The basic elements in a communication model involved are: Sender- this is the one who initiates and passes a message. Receiver-this is the person that the message is directed to. Decode-when the receiver translates the message into something one can understand through one’s personal experience or the language one understands. Encoding-this is conversion of the words to symbols is what is known as encoding. (West & Turner, 2011). Channel-this is the medium used to convey the message. Feedback-it is the process the receiver shows whether or not the message has been understood the way the sender intended it. Message-this is the subject of communication. Noise, another major element (Narula, 2006) is considered a way of distorting the message by distracting the receiver. The different processes are: the linear; which involves a sender, message and receiver. The message flows directly from the sender to receiver and this usually does not require feedback. Transactional model has the sender and receiver playing the same roles at the same time (Chaturvedi & Chaturvedi, 2011). It seems ineffective and chaotic especially because noise is usually an element here. Interactive model is an upgrade of linear which allows feedback element because the receiver can send back the message after encoding. From the explanation above, I used the transactional model which was ineffective since I talked most of the time and noise distorted the message due to the shouting as I reprimanded the members. The best model to be used here would have been the interactive model because this would have allowed both parties to exchange words, allowing for a conversation to take place

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

Argumentative research paper on Airport security versues Civil rights

Argumentative on Airport security versues Civil rights violated - Research Paper Example Security systems have been streamlined to keep the common goal of fighting terrorism alive across the world, with the most threatened countries making stringent efforts for the same. Such security systems have been facilitated at the airports, targeting international air travelers which are a common channel for terrorist activities (Basrky, 33). Stringent security searches have however faced profound criticism across the world. Whereas general rules guiding the conduct of security offices performing security searches and other procedures in airport security checks provide for humane treatment of the public, it is debatable as to whether it can actually take place. This is because there are two challenges that face the delicate issue of national and international security. First, the inherent human errors affecting officials even in other areas of service delivery could also affect the security department. Secondly, the public opinion has proved to be skeptical even in as serious as s ecurity is. The following text is an analysis of criticism launched against security systems at the airports, within the context of violation of civil rights. Alternatively, there are concluding remarks at the end of the analysis. Criticism has particularly been staged against airport security systems due to the violation of human rights that the public is exposed to (Committee on Commercial Aviation Security, 43). Personal space is intruded when the searches conducted in the airport reveal extra and irrelevant details of personal privacy and space. Some security checks are intrusive and against the reasonable intention that a similar exercise should achieve. The use of tactile searches is demeaning to the individuals undergoing it. The extensive tactile searches applied in the guise of searching for weapons and explosives are unnecessary and better methods and techniques should be devised. The objective of the search is in many instances not clearly brought out in the